Instead of Cost Reduction, Make Cost Reallocation Your Mantra
As noted in my previous post, service reviews are started for a number of reasons. The driving factor for them is that governments, on whole, are being asked to meet an increasing service demand from their community, without increasing tax rates.
To tout the success and impact of these initiatives governments tend to use on measure above all else: cost reduction.
Cost reduction is an easy, effective, and universally understood metric for success, and this is why it is commonly used. Many times, it is the only publicly available result of the service review. In a quick Google search, I was able to find calculations from Regina, Vancouver, and Toronto, ranging from $1.95 million to well $167 million in estimated savings.
That said, I believe cost reduction does a poor job of communicating the success of service reviews: Read more

My grandfather was an amateur historian, and probably should have been a professional historian, if he had not chosen to be an architect instead. He created a massive book filled with artifacts, letters, and photos from my family’s history. Within this tome, I found Royal Navy letters following the Battle of Trafalgar, World War I correspondences, and a newspaper article from 1905 describing the family crest that I have used for my logo. In fact, the logo is literally a photo of this crest that I cleaned up in Photoshop.